This is a good update on my page
Please take a look at it.
by Stephen Pidgeon
Department of Homeland Security Director Janet Napolitano has ordered TSA personnel to have sexual contact with travelers who refuse to be photographed in the nude by means of the body scanners now deployed in airports, and TSA agents have complied. The person is subjected to such sexual contact by forcible compulsion, with the threat of incarceration and large fines for failing to comply.
Under the Washington State Criminal Code, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano is guilty of the commission of numerous felonies — a felony count for each person subjected to such pat downs, and felonies of the foulest kind: the taking of indecent liberties. Here is the statute:
As of now, individuals have a choice to “opt-out” from the strip search, but those who do will be forced to submit to an even more thorough screening. A TSA official announced they will be moving away from the “traditional hand-pat to more of a hand sliding motion.” Regardless of the erroneous names the TSA uses for groping, this system of subservience represents a microcosm of totalitarianism.”
The scanners used by the TSA render digital photographs of a person completely nude, and when enhanced with simple software available to the TSA, become explicit, detailed, color photos of the person in the nude, both front and back. There have already been cases of these photographs being stored and used in settings outside security. Gizmodo lost track of some 35,000 images, that somehow ended up with a tech website that published the images that were taken at a Florida federal courthouse.
This technology was deployed after an individual who was on a terrorist watch list, bought a one-way ticket to the U.S. with cash, and was seated on the plane without a passport. The placement of this individual on a flight under these circumstances alone warrants the dismissal of all of the upper management at Homeland Security, starting with the vociferously incompetent Janet Napolitano and working its way down until you finally fire the security staff in Amsterdam.
Nonetheless, the terrorist who appeared to be carefully placed on the aircraft by security themselves, apparently tried to light flammable but non-explosive material in his underwear during the flight; hence, nude photographs of all Americans who fly commercial airlines must now be taken in order to secure our air space.
The truth is, that the sexual deviants and alcoholics in Amsterdam that allowed this fellow on the flight could as easily have been part of a conspiracy to promote this technology; in part, to deliver a false flag excuse for yet another useless technology at the airport, but mostly in order to provide the perverts in government with nude photographs of people, although the bulk of the interest is in nude photographs of children.
Yes, I am accusing the TSA of taking and storing nude photographs of children that are being secured digitally and sold throughout the world without our knowledge as a kickback to the child molesters working in government here and abroad.
We know exactly what is going on at SeaTac, and it is time to end this perverted crime spree. In the meantime, here is a list of the crimes TSA personnel are committing as we speak.
Applicable state law
The taking of a photograph of a person’s body that is covered by clothing and intended to be protected from public view is the crime of voyeurism, RCW 9A.44.115. A person commits the crime of voyeurism if, for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person, he or she knowingly views, photographs, or films:
Stephen Pidgeon, juris doctorate, is a recipient of the 2008 Presidential Commission, the 2008 Reagan Congressional Commission, a two-time recipient of the Congressional Medal of Distinction (2006, 2007), and a designee for the 2006 Businessman of the Year award. Visit his website at www.StephenPidgeon.com.
TSA thinks they can fondel and Molest people who OPT OUT of full naked body scans!
Please take a look at it.
by Stephen Pidgeon
Department of Homeland Security Director Janet Napolitano has ordered TSA personnel to have sexual contact with travelers who refuse to be photographed in the nude by means of the body scanners now deployed in airports, and TSA agents have complied. The person is subjected to such sexual contact by forcible compulsion, with the threat of incarceration and large fines for failing to comply.
Under the Washington State Criminal Code, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano is guilty of the commission of numerous felonies — a felony count for each person subjected to such pat downs, and felonies of the foulest kind: the taking of indecent liberties. Here is the statute:
RCW 9A.44.100, Indecent libertiesThe Transportation Security Agency (TSA) has deployed full body scanning technology at SeaTac Airport. (Sea-Tac installs body scanners, Leave your weapons at home this Thanksgiving because air travel may now require a strip search, Taylor Lutz, The Daily Evergreen, Published: 11/16/2010.) According to The Daily Evergreen “machines violate basic human rights and dignities by strip-searching innocent people. Without probable cause or any reasonable suspicion, innocent civilians are being subjected to the same treatment that would usually be reserved for criminals. In other words, everyone is guilty until proven innocent.
(1) A person is guilty of indecent liberties when he or she knowingly causes another person who is not his or her spouse to have sexual contact with him or her or another:
(a) By forcible compulsion;
(b) When the other person is incapable of consent by reason of being mentally defective, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless;
(c) When the victim is a person with a developmental disability and the perpetrator is a person who is not married to the victim and who:
(i) Has supervisory authority over the victim; or
(ii) Was providing transportation, within the course of his or her employment, to the victim at the time of the offense;
(2)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, indecent liberties is a class B felony.
(b) Indecent liberties by forcible compulsion is a class A felony
As of now, individuals have a choice to “opt-out” from the strip search, but those who do will be forced to submit to an even more thorough screening. A TSA official announced they will be moving away from the “traditional hand-pat to more of a hand sliding motion.” Regardless of the erroneous names the TSA uses for groping, this system of subservience represents a microcosm of totalitarianism.”
The scanners used by the TSA render digital photographs of a person completely nude, and when enhanced with simple software available to the TSA, become explicit, detailed, color photos of the person in the nude, both front and back. There have already been cases of these photographs being stored and used in settings outside security. Gizmodo lost track of some 35,000 images, that somehow ended up with a tech website that published the images that were taken at a Florida federal courthouse.
This technology was deployed after an individual who was on a terrorist watch list, bought a one-way ticket to the U.S. with cash, and was seated on the plane without a passport. The placement of this individual on a flight under these circumstances alone warrants the dismissal of all of the upper management at Homeland Security, starting with the vociferously incompetent Janet Napolitano and working its way down until you finally fire the security staff in Amsterdam.
Nonetheless, the terrorist who appeared to be carefully placed on the aircraft by security themselves, apparently tried to light flammable but non-explosive material in his underwear during the flight; hence, nude photographs of all Americans who fly commercial airlines must now be taken in order to secure our air space.
The truth is, that the sexual deviants and alcoholics in Amsterdam that allowed this fellow on the flight could as easily have been part of a conspiracy to promote this technology; in part, to deliver a false flag excuse for yet another useless technology at the airport, but mostly in order to provide the perverts in government with nude photographs of people, although the bulk of the interest is in nude photographs of children.
Yes, I am accusing the TSA of taking and storing nude photographs of children that are being secured digitally and sold throughout the world without our knowledge as a kickback to the child molesters working in government here and abroad.
We know exactly what is going on at SeaTac, and it is time to end this perverted crime spree. In the meantime, here is a list of the crimes TSA personnel are committing as we speak.
Applicable state law
The taking of a photograph of a person’s body that is covered by clothing and intended to be protected from public view is the crime of voyeurism, RCW 9A.44.115. A person commits the crime of voyeurism if, for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person, he or she knowingly views, photographs, or films:
(2)(a) Another person without that person’s knowledge and consent while the person being viewed, photographed, or filmed is in a place where he or she would have a reasonable expectation of privacy; orAs for the TSA workers who are taking nude photographs of children, these workers are also perpetrating felonies under state law, pursuant to RCW 9.68A.040, the sexual exploitation of a minor.
(b) The intimate areas of another person without that person’s knowledge and consent and under circumstances where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, whether in a public or private place.
(3) Voyeurism is a class C felony.
If you object to the taking of such photographs, you are subjected to a search that includes groping of intimate body parts, which is also a crime, pursuant to RCW 9A.44.170
(1) A person is guilty of custodial sexual misconduct in the second degree when the person has sexual contact with another person:
(b) When the victim is being detained, under arrest, or in the custody of a law enforcement officer and the perpetrator is a law enforcement officer.
(2) Consent of the victim is not a defense to a prosecution under this section.
(3) Custodial sexual misconduct in the second degree is a gross misdemeanor.
(1) A person is guilty of sexual exploitation of a minor if the person:When the parent rightfully declines to allow the TSA to sexually exploit their child, and the TSA subjects the child to a search that includes making sexual contact, yet another felony has been perpetrated, pursuant to RCW 9A.44.083:
(a) Compels a minor by threat or force to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that such conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance;
(b) Aids, invites, employs, authorizes, or causes a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that such conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance; or
(c) Being a parent, legal guardian, or person having custody or control of a minor, permits the minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing that the conduct will be photographed or part of a live performance.
(2) Sexual exploitation of a minor is a class B felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW.
(1) A person is guilty of child molestation in the first degree when the person has, or knowingly causes another person under the age of eighteen to have, sexual contact with another who is less than twelve years old and not married to the perpetrator and the perpetrator is at least thirty-six months older than the victim.Any law enforcement officer who knows of these crimes and willfully turns away from making an arrest is aiding and abetting these crimes pursuant to RCW 9A.08.020 (4-6).
(2) Child molestation in the first degree is a class A felony.
Stephen Pidgeon, juris doctorate, is a recipient of the 2008 Presidential Commission, the 2008 Reagan Congressional Commission, a two-time recipient of the Congressional Medal of Distinction (2006, 2007), and a designee for the 2006 Businessman of the Year award. Visit his website at www.StephenPidgeon.com.
0 comments:
Post a Comment